Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:01:32 +0200
From:      Thierry Thomas <thierry@thomas.as>
To:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Package dependency limitations
Message-ID:  <20010711120132.A28981@graf.pompo.net>
In-Reply-To: <35864.994754601@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>; from sheldonh@starjuice.net on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:43:21AM %2B0200
References:  <35864.994754601@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 10 Jul 01 à 10:43:21 +0000, Sheldon Hearn écrivait :
> However, package dependencies say this:
> 
> 	If port y is not installed, install port y.
> 
> This is a pain in the ass for things like mod_perl, which are designed
> to work for any variant of apache, e.g. apache13 or apache13-fp.

Yes, all these ports of apache13* are unhandy. If would be better to
have a master port for apache13, and slaves for -fp / -modssl / etc.

But there is a workaround: it is possible to run pkgdepfix to register
the effective dependencies (it comes with sysutils/portupgrade).
-- 
Th. Thomas.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010711120132.A28981>