From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Jul 11 14:44:58 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA07873
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 14:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from twwells.com (twwells.com [199.79.159.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA07859
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 14:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by twwells.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #8)
	id m0ueTWG-0001ESC; Thu, 11 Jul 96 17:43 EDT
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Subject: limits on db data size?
Date: 11 Jul 1996 17:43:29 -0400
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <4s3si1$jj7@twwells.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.twwells.com
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Older versions of dbm don't let you have key or data longer than
the block size (minus epsilon, one presumes). The question is: do
the db routines have a similar limitation?