From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 10:23:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18717106567D for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from g.r.vansickle@att.net) Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E028FC2A for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:23:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from g.r.vansickle@att.net) Received: from dfw5rb41 (h-66-167-177-50.chcgilgm.dynamic.covad.net[66.167.177.50]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with SMTP id <2009011610092911300avn8ve>; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:09:30 +0000 From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: References: <1b9f9a570901141518q1ba70c73ibc58a4f32811e254@mail.gmail.com><496EE1D9.7090309@nurfuerspam.de> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:09:28 -0600 Message-ID: <17C934E643C24C478EAA0C15A2D898EB@DFW5RB41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Thread-Index: Acl3KHYR5/OuF+bZTIuYij7n6GyLfgAmOViw X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:25:25 +0000 Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [Lcdproc] LCDProc CVS + PicoLCD on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:23:19 -0000 > From: Andre Guibert de Bruet > [] > > Unfortunately the PicoLCD 2X20 and 4X20 devices present > themselves as HID devices. ...but... they *are* HID devices. Why is this "unfortunate"? > I filed PR usb/128803 and attached > a patch which quirks the device, so that it doesn't get > attached to by the HID driver (Thus making it available to > libusb). It can be found at > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128803 > . It would be awesome if this would get committed on > CURRENT and possibly MFC'ed... :) Perhaps I'm missing something, but how would that be awesome? Wouldn't it be significantly more awesome if these HID devices were communicated with in the same manner as any other HID device? Or is FreeBSD's HID support really that broken? -- Gary R. Van Sickle