From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Apr 7 8:18: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dire.bris.ac.uk (dire.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF9B37B41A for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 08:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk by dire.bris.ac.uk with SMTP-PRIV with ESMTP; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 16:14:16 +0100 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 16uELk-0005YL-00; Sun, 07 Apr 2002 16:13:00 +0100 Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 16:13:00 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: Casey Scott Cc: Walter Hop , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: ntpd In-Reply-To: <001d01c1de46$5557d0e0$0601a8c0@nixfusion.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Casey Scott wrote: > Is that to save the resources that ntpd uses, or does it (ntpdate) > circumvent the kernel's 1 second adjustment limitation? At securelevel 2, ntpdate is hamstrung too. ntpd gives your clock a smoother ride; I'd generally prefer it. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk __/\____/\_____/\____/|_____________________________________ flatline To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message