From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 23:06:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FE216A419; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A2E13C45B; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:06:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from Macintosh-2.local ([10.0.0.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m0BMdCIC012897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:39:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Message-ID: <4787F00F.6070405@errno.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:39:11 -0800 From: Sam Leffler Organization: Errno Consulting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <20080111205704.GE4787@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20080111205704.GE4787@soaustin.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC--Metrics: ebb.errno.com; whitelist Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Coverity problems? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:06:11 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:12:27PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >> These numbers seem strange and out of proportion. I know there has been >> prior cooperation with Coverity - is this just old data? > > IIRC Coverity is not tracking our use of their software, at least in > those statistics. Someone was telling me yesterday that was because > we have our own copy of the Coverity server which we use, rather than > accessing the one on their site that generates the statistics. > > Someone, please correct me if I'm wrong. You are correct; we've had a private coverity server doing nightly runs long before coverity setup this service (the project has their own license through the FreeBSD Foundation). I have no idea why coverity continues to do freebsd runs as the results are also not meaningful because their default models generate false positives that we've long since filtered out. Sam