Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:38:01 +0100
From:      Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de>
To:        Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, oliver@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/security/courier-authlib Makefile ports/security/courier-authlib/files courier-authdaemond.sh.in
Message-ID:  <20060112203801.3c133ca4.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
In-Reply-To: <200601122015.04204.flz@xbsd.org>
References:  <200601121856.k0CIu4mZ030416@repoman.freebsd.org> <200601122015.04204.flz@xbsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Florent Thoumie wrote:

> On Thursday 12 January 2006 19:56, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> > oliver      2006-01-12 18:56:04 UTC
> >
> >   FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> >   Modified files:
> >     security/courier-authlib Makefile
> >     security/courier-authlib/files courier-authdaemond.sh.in
> >   Log:
> >   make courier-authdaemon work if it's build with MySQL support by changing
> >   the rcNg startscript.
> >
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.22      +1 -1      ports/security/courier-authlib/Makefile
> >   1.4       +1 -1     
> > ports/security/courier-authlib/files/courier-authdaemond.sh.in
> 
> 	No rc.d script should depend on ldconfig_compat, this doesn't exist in HEAD.
> 
> 	Actually, ldconfig_compat script should be run right after ldconfig so 
> 	everything should be working fine. If that's not the case, I'll consider 
> 	adding ldconfig_compat in PROVIDE to /etc/rc.d/ldconfig but I don't quite 
> 	like it.

It does but this is not guaranted - or? And what's the problem in having
it in there? There is no provider for it on HEAD, but that hurts none?!


One example:

sh -c 'rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* 2>/dev/null'

produces sth. like:

...
/etc/rc.d/pppoed
/etc/rc.d/pwcheck
/etc/rc.d/virecover
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache2.sh
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/ldconfig_compat
/etc/rc.d/DAEMON
/etc/rc.d/apm
/etc/rc.d/apmd
...

Adding "ldconfig" to apache2.sh's REQUIRE doesn't move apache2.sh
behind ldconfig_compat.



-- 
 Oliver Lehmann
  http://www.pofo.de/
  http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060112203801.3c133ca4.lehmann>