From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Sep 14 09:17:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA27275 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 09:17:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu (SICILY.ODYSSEY.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.185.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA27268; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 09:17:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rvb@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu) From: rvb@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Satoshi Asami , jkh@time.cdrom.com Subject: Re: /usr/ports/filesystems Date: 14 Sep 1998 12:16:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: Satoshi Asami's message of Mon, 14 Sep 1998 05:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/Emacs 19.34 Source-Info: Sender is really rvb@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I wanted to propose that we introduce a new directory under ports to place file systems related ports. My main reason for suggesting this was to create a logical place to put the CODA pieces: coda_client, coda_server and some coda_doc related pieces. But I thought other ports could go there as well, afs -- when it exists. Also /net/ is a rather overused place, so perhaps samba belongs in filesystems and perhaps the crypto fs (cfs -- currently in security). Lastly, I prefer the longer name, filesystems, to something like fs which I think is too cryptic. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message