From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 06:40:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3BBD07972; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2CB31A8D; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v2B6eff1056456 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 22:40:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v2B6efIG056455; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 22:40:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 22:40:41 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MANPATH not handled correctly Message-ID: <20170311064041.GA56446@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20170108192633.GA42537@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20170311063440.jorxsa3hod2pjuxu@ivaldir.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170311063440.jorxsa3hod2pjuxu@ivaldir.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:40:43 -0000 On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 07:34:40AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 11:26:33AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > MANPATH is not handled correctly. According to the documentation > > in apropos(1) and whatis(1): > > (snip) > > Sorry it took time, but it is now fixed. the issue was we have kept our man(1) > when importing mandoc and I have not noticed that mandoc had that feature. > > I implemented it in our man(1) > > While here I removed the painful warning > Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! -- Steve 20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow