From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 4 19:26:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C577016A41F for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2007 19:26:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1A313C458 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2007 19:26:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o4so394842uge for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:26:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rEcgYwNrNEfP3989nms/OiVCkfbvgNTASgJDDtXk9H/HpBA8tEVILJ5XKyogZqH7iOAtQ86M0oSbLJmFLXFKVp6DMIOqWadI5ldUMqotmFNvkpNIXncRj8AUeRrpPzsntVP4dWnYq7PlZiETXMxA0N16t9fJM7z550X20kgdEqk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TKLT2HePvmNYFTPT2juA4MIj/kDNdmj1/HI2Emmbh+oJQbMGcllgKqbDvnicKBpmuUuEn1a5WI7qkfzZhrJKZfbZCXvxhm5wBaVjRTZLMQkx6cqpcEPeoVvKXkEg5aVrNFUnJVC+H2xTRzsE1fqzsqTSirpDmtrbxyO9k7nlB9U= Received: by 10.82.158.12 with SMTP id g12mr18516659bue.1183577188615; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.6 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jul 2007 12:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:26:28 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Olivier Nicole" In-Reply-To: <200707040856.l648uDbG039253@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200707040856.l648uDbG039253@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recursivity of -r and -R in portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 19:26:30 -0000 On 04/07/07, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, > > I am wondering is the option -R and -r are mutually recursive in > portupgrade. > > That is, if the option -R applies to every ports detected by -r and > respectively if -r applies to every ports detected by -R. > > Lest take the example of: > > portupgrade -fRr gd > > gd depends on png, does it upgrade png with portupgrade -fRr png? > If I am recalling correctly, it does not. > php4-gd is built from gd, does it upgrade php4-gd with > portupgrade -Rrf php4-gd? (That will in turn upgrade php, maybe > apache...) Nor here, though if php and apache record gd as a requirement they will be rebuilt. Very good idea to use the -n flag. -- --