From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Dec  3 04:31:08 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA09041
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 04:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eel.dataplex.net (eel.dataplex.net [208.2.87.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA09036
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 04:31:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [208.2.87.4] (cod [208.2.87.4])
          by eel.dataplex.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA21752;
          Tue, 3 Dec 1996 06:31:01 -0600 (CST)
X-Sender: rkw@mail.dataplex.net
Message-Id: <l03010900aec9ccdc0ced@[208.2.87.4]>
In-Reply-To: <1377.849587484@time.cdrom.com>
References: Your message of "Mon, 02 Dec 1996 22:37:07 EST."            
 <32A3A063.41C67EA6@mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 06:30:54 -0600
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
Subject: Re: 2.2ALPHA Question
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> If fixes are available, how will they be delivered for testing purposes.
>> CTM, CVS ??
>
>CVS for now, CTM I'm not sure about.

Jordan, are you behind the times or are you telling me that you intend to
drop the support for ctm? You, personally, set up the stuff to provide the
archive access for 2.2 almost a month ago.