From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Apr  3 14:59:31 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA20621 for current-outgoing; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 14:59:31 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id OAA20612; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 14:59:29 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth)
cc: current@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: Thinking about CTM and the installation.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 Apr 95 07:32:44 CDT."
             <v02120b01aba599575eb5@[199.183.109.242]> 
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 1995 14:59:29 -0700
Message-ID: <20610.796946369@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 1) Signing up with CTM should set up the CTM tree structure and register
> you for FUTURE mailings.
> 2) The CDROM should have the appropriate flags to indicate the CTM level of
> that set of sources.
> 3) The missing part is the set of CTM updates that occurred between the
> time the CD was mastered and the present time. Do we need an automated
> ftp-by-mail to have those updates also sent?

No, I don't think so..  Truly, I don't think that the problem is badly
understood or anything - most of us know EXACTLY what's missing from
CTM and even how to solve it.  It's just finding the time for actually
doing the work involved that is the major problem right now! :-(

					Jordan