From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 7 23:32:17 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA02930 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jun 1995 23:32:17 -0700 Received: from campino.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.225.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id XAA02924 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 1995 23:32:14 -0700 Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de by campino.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (4.1/campino-7) id AA06548; Thu, 8 Jun 95 08:32:07 +0200 Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.8/8.6.9) id IAA02863 for freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com; Thu, 8 Jun 1995 08:44:37 +0200 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 08:44:37 +0200 From: "Christoph P. Kukulies" Message-Id: <199506080644.IAA02863@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: xdm (ain't there no-des anymore?) Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk There were times when there were xdm-des and xdm-nodes in the XF86 distrib. Has DES code been taken out of xdm or what is the reason for this. I'm asking because I'm helping a person who cannot login through his xdm prompter and the des/nodes difference came to mind. -Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de FreeBSD blues.physik.rwth-aachen.de 2.0-BUILT-19950606 FreeBSD 2.0-BUILT-1995 0606 #0: Tue Jun 6 19:13:32 MET DST 1995 kuku@blues.physik.rwth-aachen.de :/usr/src/sys/compile/BLUESGUS i386