From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 26 15:50:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4967214BFC for ; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 15:50:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA01926; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 15:50:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 15:50:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: gregm@netidea.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: metamail and metasend In-Reply-To: <199904241742.KAA00595@everest.netidea.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 24 Apr 1999 gregm@netidea.com wrote: > I recieved some binaries from an associate. They had been > encrypted in base64 and split by metasend. I don't see any sign of > metasend or metamail in the ports. I'd appreciate any comments > on both base64 decoding and rejoining split files. Incidentely, > should it matter I'm using 2.2.8-release. You might try mpack, which is in the ports tree. Doug White Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message