From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 18 07:40:34 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FDB16A4CE
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:40:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp-1.dlr.de (smtp-1.dlr.de [195.37.61.185])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D4E43D3F
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:40:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de)
Received: from beagle.kn.op.dlr.de ([129.247.173.6]) by smtp-1.dlr.de over TLS
	secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
	Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:40:32 +0200
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:40:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de>
X-X-Sender: brandt_h@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de
To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050416150810.GD5452@empiric.icir.org>
Message-ID: <20050418093938.I1882@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
References: <20050415173711.I658@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
	<20050416150810.GD5452@empiric.icir.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Apr 2005 07:40:32.0674 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[E6B13020:01C543E9]
cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:40:34 -0000

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Bruce M Simpson wrote:

BMS>On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
BMS>> While there I would also remove everything from netnatm that is not needed 
BMS>> by NgATM. This is mainly the socket interface. I'm not aware of any 
BMS>> application that uses it. Any thoughts on this?
BMS>
BMS>Oh. Don't remove that. Userland PPP needs it. People who are using ADSL
BMS>modems of any kind will still need it.

Does it really use socket(AF_ATM, ... or socket(AF_NATM, ...? Any chance 
to convert this to netgraph sockets?

harti