From owner-freebsd-net Thu Oct 28 0:32:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.nwlink.com (smtp.nwlink.com [209.20.130.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC05014E65 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 00:32:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from craigc@nwlink.com) Received: from craigc (ip133.gte8.rb1.bel.nwlink.com [209.20.237.133]) by smtp.nwlink.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA11340; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 00:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <217001bf2117$7dfb5150$0201010a@fuzzer.com> From: "Craig Critchley" To: Cc: "Garrett Wollman" , References: <199910280701.AAA27351@implode.root.com> Subject: Re: FTP Net Performance Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 00:38:56 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From: David Greenman > Uh, yeah, that very clearly shows that the Windows box is dropping packets > occasionally. Probably insufficient buffering (or just lousy network card) on > the Windows side. It's the same model netcard as what's in the BSD machine - Netgear FA310TX. File sharing between Windows machines is *significantly* faster. I can imagine that BSD thinks its already sent as much as the receiver can take, but why does it think it needs to resend that particular piece when Windows has ack'd it twice (unless doing so is a bad idea - like I said, I'm not that much of an expert). Thanks, ...Craig To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message