From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Mar 25 12: 3:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.surf1.de (mail.Surf1.de [194.25.165.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44CA37B91F for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 12:03:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alex@cichlids.com) Received: from cichlids.com (pC19F5485.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [193.159.84.133]) by mail.surf1.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA30293; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 20:02:35 +0100 Received: from cichlids.cichlids.com (cichlids.cichlids.com [192.168.0.10]) by cichlids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14E9AC2C; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 20:03:49 +0100 (CET) Received: (from alex@localhost) by cichlids.cichlids.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA20038; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 20:01:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from alex) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 20:01:58 +0100 From: Alexander Langer To: Akinori -Aki- MUSHA Cc: andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM, des@flood.ping.uio.no, vns@delta.odessa.ua, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linprocfs and vmware Message-ID: <20000325200158.A20007@cichlids.cichlids.com> Mail-Followup-To: Akinori -Aki- MUSHA , andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM, des@flood.ping.uio.no, vns@delta.odessa.ua, ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20000325115346.H391@argon.blackdawn.com> <20000325175741.A17607@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20000325120025.J391@argon.blackdawn.com> <20000325180409.A17825@cichlids.cichlids.com> <86itybgcmk.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20000325192950.A19359@cichlids.cichlids.com> <86g0tehodz.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <86g0tehodz.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>; from knu@idaemons.org on Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 03:54:00AM +0900 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 28 CA 4C 46 5B D3 A8 A8 E3 BA F3 4E 60 7D 7F X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung. Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thus spake Akinori -Aki- MUSHA (knu@idaemons.org): > I think he/she'd rather upgrade the system to -STABLE or grab the > linprocfs port which is now part of the system. Either way is > easy. Yes, that's what I support, too. When we added the vmware port, the users even had to use -current, it should no problem for them now to use a recent -stable. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message