Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:01:31 -0400
From:      Miles Nordin <carton@Ivy.NET>
To:        freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pthread_mutex_timedlock on sparc64
Message-ID:  <oqzmiggdw4.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET>
In-Reply-To: <20060420205340.GA29736@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:53:40 -0400")
References:  <20060418204240.GA69833@xor.obsecurity.org> <001801c66372$a032e770$2522630a@t22> <20060419054116.GA39394@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604190835400.1870@sea.ntplx.net> <20060420074713.Y52948@hades.admin.frm2> <20060420182331.GA26174@xor.obsecurity.org> <oqk69khvsx.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET> <20060420204114.GA29490@xor.obsecurity.org> <oq64l4ht5o.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET> <20060420205340.GA29736@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Thu_Apr_20_17:01:22_2006-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "kk" == Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:

    kk> libkse . . .  M:N

k.

    kk> libthr 

man page says this is 1:1, kernel threads like Linux or Solaris >= 9

    kk> libc_r

# man libc_r
No manual entry for libc_r
# man libc
No manual entry for libc
# man c_r
No manual entry for c_r

Is libc_r 1:N a.k.a. userland threads?

Thanks for taking the time, sry for multiple emails.

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Thu_Apr_20_17:01:22_2006-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)

iQCVAwUAREf2q4nCBbTaW/4dAQKAngQAsLjQ2XEWVHgs4K93y0BhZ/8LF/JvxhCW
+nNZqc7Fo3YmP9lyVp14GkcIdLyOWjqmgBgvUazgapgk8FibW5qIi6gwl1VGZA8X
NSeTrgCm1a1eS64G8TVdsRrYLB4tSo2ZuWMKcUOvd2E4TY3xkFBx7cqkc3JEGR9w
ZDOY2SpaLWE=
=axQ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Thu_Apr_20_17:01:22_2006-1--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?oqzmiggdw4.fsf>