From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 26 15:52: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71A415055 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 15:51:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA01966; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 15:51:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 15:51:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Spidey Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Bind in a sandbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 24 Apr 1999, Spidey wrote: > Hi! > > I've been running BIND in a sandbox for some time now. I have a > intermittent connection to the net, so sometimes, I have messages like > named[$$]: deleting interface $MYADDR.53. This was normal. > > But now that I run BIND in a sandbox, I get: > > Apr 24 14:22:25 freed named[101]: bind(dfd=22, [10.0.2.15].53): > Permission denied > Apr 24 14:22:25 freed named[101]: bind(dfd=22, [10.0.2.15].53): Permission > denied > Apr 24 14:22:25 freed named[101]: bind(dfd=22, [10.0.2.15].53): Permission > denied > Apr 24 14:22:25 freed named[101]: deleting interface [10.0.2.15].53 > > > I start bind using: named -u bind -g bind > > Thanks. Since you're not running as root, you're not allowed to attach to the privilieged port 53. I'm not familiar with the sandbox behavior so I don'tknow how named gets around this. Doug White Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message