Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 17:45:21 -0500 (CDT) From: "Benjamin M. Manes" <maneben@charlie.cns.iit.edu> To: Mark Ovens <mark@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Cc: Adam Szilveszter <sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu>, Greg Skafte <skafte@worldgate.ca>, freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: An article from Microsoft Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.95.991006174107.8486C-100000@charlie.cns.iit.edu> In-Reply-To: <19991006233622.B400@marder-1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Intel previews 64-bit Merced > > "...With only a couple of weeks to put the working Merced > chips into systems and port software, it was impressive > that the company could show Windows NT64 (in command-line > mode only) and Linux already running. The Linux > demonstration even had the Apache Web Server running with > a Windows 98 client." > > Looks like Linux is ahead of M$ :) Perhaps, but there are a lot of differences still, ones that IMO, make it much harder for MS. Linux has a far easier time, since its still only the kernel. Windows is the OS... Anyways, this is not FreeBSD advocacy, and I believe the MS bashing should not become popular in BSD advocacy, its worse enough to have it continously streamed with any Linux advocacy comment. This thread is better offlist, or if viable on any FreeBSD list, -chat. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SGI.3.95.991006174107.8486C-100000>