From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 24 23:49:49 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA05500 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:49:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from xserver.nocal.com (xserver.nocal.com [207.173.133.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA05494 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:49:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michael@nocal.com) Received: from main2.nocal.com (main2.nocal.com [207.173.133.243]) by xserver.nocal.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA00818; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:49:38 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990124234845.00b94e00@pop.nocal.com> X-Sender: michael@pop.nocal.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:49:37 -0800 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" From: Mike Stickney Subject: Re: What is the Final EOL Disposition of v2.2.8? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3419.917248557@zippy.cdrom.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 11:15 PM 1/24/99 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > >That sounds like a good idea. We may also want to make a 2.2S CDROM >which contains the very last of everything done on the 2.2 branch. >From what I've heard so far, there would be demand for something >containing the very last packages/XFree86/2.2 snap/... for the branch >and if we needed to go to 6 CDs on it, we could even do that if that >meant making the last CD distro a truly comprehensive "cap" to the 2.2 >branch. What do people think? Please! I'll step up to the plate. --- Mike Stickney michael@nocal.com http://www.nocal.com michael@km6px.com http://www.km6px.com F4C4 38F7 4000 5B39 980D 827A FB9A 1BCF 8E91 3C83 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message