From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Apr 12 10:28:45 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA20004 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 12 Apr 1996 10:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA19996 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 1996 10:28:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (sendmail/PALMER-1) with SMTP id SAA05734 ; Fri, 12 Apr 1996 18:25:50 +0100 (BST) To: A JOSEPH KOSHY cc: install@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: Whew In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 12 Apr 1996 14:22:55 +0530." <199604120852.AA278169175@fakir.india.hp.com> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 18:25:49 +0100 Message-ID: <5732.829329949@palmer.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk A JOSEPH KOSHY wrote in message ID <199604120852.AA278169175@fakir.india.hp.com>: > a. Why do we, on make release: > > 1. first make world > 2. copy sources to the chroot tree, chroot, and make world again? > 3. cut the package > > Can't we directly go to the package cutting step after the first > make world? Nope. Then the packages built would be tainted by any old cruft lying around on the base system ... > b. The kernel in the boot floppy was built with my driver, but it wasn't > present in the kernel that finally appeared on the installed disk. > Are these different? Yes. The installed kernel is taken from the bin dist. Gary