From owner-cvs-release Thu Jul 3 21:49:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA08507 for cvs-release-outgoing; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 21:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA08485; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 21:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA04258; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 21:49:18 -0700 (PDT) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-release@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/sysinstall Makefile In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 03 Jul 1997 21:45:43 PDT." <199707040445.VAA23941@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 03 Jul 1997 21:49:17 -0700 Message-ID: <4254.867991757@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > executable? Yes. Is it less bogus than not providing a reasonable > install target so you can tell users where to go and type "make all install " > in order to update sysinstall? No. Hence this commit, with reservations. ^^ I mean yes. This is no less than I deserve for posing awkward, rhetorical questions in a commit message. :) Jordan