From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 4 22:10:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F951065670 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:10:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14B38FC08 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q04MDc6x023294 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:13:38 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:13:38 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201201042213.q04MDc6x023294@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20120104123452.708ac5a7@scorpio> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:10:38 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 4 11:39:20 2012 > Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:34:52 -0500 > From: Jerry > To: FreeBSD > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 09:00:12 -0700 > Chad Perrin articulated: > > > You just ignored the salient point of what Robert Bonomi said, in > > favor of trivialities. If you prefer, pretend he said: > > > > HE asked that they explain "why it *IS* morally correct..." > > > > The point he was making is no less present and clear, and now your > > momentary diversion is no longer part of the equation. > > In any case, he is probably back under his bridge now anyway. Oh my. Ad hominems, again. The next-to-last resort of those who _know_ they have no rational argument to present. > Both of you > have continued to spew the same garbage while ignoring the simple fact > that I did not attributed the statements you claim I did to you. FALSE TO FACT. You did, in fact, attribute such a belief to Chad. > In all > of your accumulated bullshit you have failed to show one instance where > I did make such a claim. Your choice of language _expressly_ *DID* include the implication that Chad believed what you were 'asking' him to explain. _YOU_ cannot provide the information 'requested' by: "Can you please explain why the moon is made of green cheese?" unless you -believe- the moon *IS* made of green cheese. > > Serious Chad, I could not care less what you think. I know decent > people that I have disagreements with, I don't need a faceless one. Available evidence indicates otherwise -- given the extent to which you go out of your way to antagonize and pick fights with them. One could reasonably conclude over-compensation for a massive inferiority complex -- trying to make yourself 'feel big' by belittling others. > > Do you honestly believe that I really care about what some faceless name > on a monitor writes, or if it bothers or influences me? Have you ever > heard of "narcissistic personality disorder" aka "NPD"? Get over > yourself -- nobody is that important. You're projecting, again, Jerry. > Chad, I don't want you "GOING POSTAL(1)", so if it makes you feel > better, I will feed your psychosis. Whatever you think I said, I said. > Now have a nice cup of warm milk and relax before you hurt yourself. > End of problem and end of discussion. Oooh! A _textbook_ 'masked inferiority' attack.