From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 14 11:36:29 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB0216A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 14 May 2004 11:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout1.pacific.net.au (mailout1.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.84])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A988143D55
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 14 May 2004 11:36:28 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au
	[61.8.0.87])i4EIaB4u020000;	Sat, 15 May 2004 04:36:11 +1000
Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246])
	i4EIa8LS031086;	Sat, 15 May 2004 04:36:09 +1000
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 04:36:09 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
To: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru>
In-Reply-To: <40A4E2CB.2000007@cronyx.ru>
Message-ID: <20040515041301.O22881@gamplex.bde.org>
References: <40A26162.9030607@cronyx.ru>
	<20040512.200542.09569104.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<20040513155109.GB6572@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
	<40A4E2CB.2000007@cronyx.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Subject: Re: Sio & Puc memory mapped
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 18:36:29 -0000

On Fri, 14 May 2004, Roman Kurakin wrote:

> May I ask you to make some tests for me?
>
> We have a set of tests, which we use for testings of our async
> adapters. I add support for one of ours cards via puc(4)&uart(4)
> drivers. These tests works fine with patches for sio(4) driver (was
> tested with 5.2 sio), but fails with puc(4)&uart(4).
>
> I don't have any other cards supported by uart(4), so I can't test
> it by my self. If you have a time and ability, I'll send these tests
> for you.

Why not just use sio?  It has been tested for hundreds if not thousands
of programmer hours in various versions over the last 16 years.  uart
fails even simple tests, and has low performance.

Bruce