Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 09 May 2013 13:23:36 -0500
From:      Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
To:        Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports Mailing List <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: USE_TEX question
Message-ID:  <518BE9A8.2070704@missouri.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CADLo839cAwZyBNejTGZxjbZC_C6UWQhRGTwcdUxbdrFWGEPvbQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <518BDE81.3060008@missouri.edu> <CADLo839cAwZyBNejTGZxjbZC_C6UWQhRGTwcdUxbdrFWGEPvbQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/09/13 13:15, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 9 May 2013 18:36, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> wrote:
>> So I have a port, math/sage, which now contains in Makefile the line
>> USE_TEX=        tetex
>>
>> I have intalled the texlive ports.  So now if I try to install math/sage, it
>> gives me error messages about CONFLICTS, which I think arise from the fact
>> that math/sage thinks that it has to first install tetex, and this conflict
>> with various texlive ports.
>>
>> But, math/sage is TEX agnostic.  It doesn't care whether it is tetex or
>> texlive that is installed.  All it really wants to know is if there is a
>> useable latex in PATH.
>>
>> It would be nice if there was a USE_TEX=yes option, or something like that,
>> which I could put into the math/sage port.
>
> USE_TEX=${TEX_DEFAULT} should work fine-- have you tried that?
>
> Chris

Ah, yes.  And you have to set TEX_DEFAULT in /etc/make.conf as well.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?518BE9A8.2070704>