From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 11 08:52:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D1516A400 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:52:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan@sf-net.com) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EA743D4C for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:52:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@sf-net.com) Received: from [195.238.138.179] (helo=[192.168.130.51]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu9) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML2xA-1FTEbx22AJ-0000dd; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:52:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <03F2063D-0333-482C-ADD5-914D162E92C0@sf-net.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:52:31 +0200 To: =?UTF-8?Q?JINMEI_Tatuya_/_=E7=A5=9E=E6=98=8E=E9=81=94=E5=93=89?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:0525cf9cbe16c6d3d153baa8ed291ac7 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raw ip paket sendto error X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:52:36 -0000 > > I guess in this case getaddrinfo() tried to match the specified > "service" (port) with a raw socket (for which there is no notion of > "service"), and returned an error. Yes your right, I tried it without the port argument and it went fine. > > BTW, when I tried the same test on Solaris 10 and OpenBSD 3.6 (and > NetBSD 2.0.1 for that matter), I saw the same error. So, it seems the > current trend is to require a specific hint, and FreeBSD is not that > special. Hmm strange, I tried it again on OpenBSD 3.8 and there were no problems (i386). > Any suggestions for the second major problem? Best regards, Stefan