From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 10 14:26:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B5A16A420 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:26:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DF443D5A for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:25:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a2so94253ugf for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:25:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=CyGRjLncdBRFGyd8kA+JdNWht4de7tmT7AEPtBLhoPwaUrqnbfYUSH3S7jGLGenhi1aIur71C9c9DQsHTb4N72/38U6k3GmbkgbcWO7mQIW2Y6ZFmKFz19EpNqs24qW5PRkCw7/c4/sptgDz/p7jocVzhU9f6n8sCuy1gHNNfmo= Received: by 10.66.255.13 with SMTP id c13mr4901665ugi; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:19:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.234.16 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:19:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5f67a8c40602100619v4ce3ab7fof3c0d45c51bd2a74@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:19:01 -0500 From: Zaphod Beeblebrox To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200602101029.k1AAT2DA056950@lurza.secnetix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060209210748.L87003@woozle.rinet.ru> <200602101029.k1AAT2DA056950@lurza.secnetix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: USB Flash reader under RELENG_6: force GEOM rescan X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:26:01 -0000 On 2/10/06, Oliver Fromme wrote: Concerning the SCSI and CAM code I'm not an expert, but I > think it should be possible to nudge devfs when a rescan > has detected a new device. You'd think, but no. You see, the device , according to CAM, doesn't change. Magically, it has more blocks, but it's the "same" device to cam. Atacontrol can remove a device, but camcontrol can't. It seems it would be sufficient to be able to have camcontrol force a rescan, but you can't.