From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 23 14:50:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2764F16A41C; Mon, 23 May 2005 14:50:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EED43D1F; Mon, 23 May 2005 14:50:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) Received: from [10.70.0.244] (daemon.mj.niksun.com [10.70.0.244]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4NEqJoG007820; Mon, 23 May 2005 10:52:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) From: Jung-uk Kim Organization: Niksun, Inc. To: obrien@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 10:49:55 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200505191431.08189.jkim@niksun.com> <20050523052211.GA65514@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20050523052211.GA65514@dragon.NUXI.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200505231049.55883.jkim@niksun.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/889/Sun May 22 06:18:49 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: rwatson@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 NUMA-awareness? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 14:50:08 -0000 On Monday 23 May 2005 01:22 am, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:31:08PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > I am not sure about the meaning of 'true NUMA capable machines' > > but AMD64 is ccNUMA unless I am completely mistaken, and > > FreeBSD/amd64 is well-supported. Even multicore processors are > > available now > > ..snip.. > > I am working on extracting the CPU & memory topology on AMD Opteron > machines. For Athlon64 X2 (dual-core) there is nothing for FreeBSD > to do differently than today. Great. I am assuming you're working on ACPI SRAT/SLIT parsing, correct? > Once I have the ability to nicely express the topology on an > Opteron system, there are two heavy hitters that have said they > will consume the bits and work on optimizing FreeBSD for Opteron > systems. If you need any help, let me know. > For Intel dual-core HTT systems, there aren't any NUMA > characteristics I'm aware of. I believe you are correct. Jung-uk Kim > -- > -- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)