From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Aug 31 6: 4:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from c1828785-a.saltlk1.ut.home.com (c1828785-a.saltlk1.ut.home.com [24.20.97.231]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E20037B405 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 06:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from there (dapatm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c1828785-a.saltlk1.ut.home.com (8.11.6/8.11.5) with SMTP id f7VD4hl01258 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:04:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from mupi@mknet.org) Message-Id: <200108311304.f7VD4hl01258@c1828785-a.saltlk1.ut.home.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mike Porter To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:04:43 -0600 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <200108310822.BAA03593@mina.soco.agilent.com> In-Reply-To: <200108310822.BAA03593@mina.soco.agilent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday 31 August 2001 02:22 am, Darryl Okahata wrote: > > Heh. I'm writing this on an Asus A7M266 (I didn't want to wait for > the nForce). Speaking of which....are the freeBSD team working on supporting the nForce (does anyone know?) or are we going to have to wait for support? (I guess the "basic" stuff should run, but IIANM, the chipset mmake available a lot of features which an OS could use to advantage....but the OS has to know about them/be able to use them for it to matter. I guess as long as it works at all...) mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message