Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:09:28 +0100 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Coleman Kane <cokane@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: UFS_GJOURNAL and ufs.ko Message-ID: <200612181909.35355.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <20061218153906.GA6910@ramen.coleyandcheryl> References: <20061218153906.GA6910@ramen.coleyandcheryl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart77835921.2Weo3IfLAM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 18 December 2006 16:39, Coleman Kane wrote: > I have noticed (since adding UFS journal support) that the > UFS_GJOURNAL option hasn't been added to the ufs.ko kernel > module. I've been using this (out of an effort to test as > much as possible as KLDs) and every time I upgrade my kernel > I must manually add -DUFS_GJOURNAL to the CFLAGS line in > its Makefile. There is always make.conf > Is there any specific reason why this can't be committed? > So far, my experience with GJOURNAL has been great testing > it both with journal+fs on the same device as well as on > two seperate devices. > > It looks like an oversight to me, but I don't want to jump > the gun on it if there is some reasonable argument to keep > it out "by default". =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart77835921.2Weo3IfLAM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFhtlfXyyEoT62BG0RAjc+AJ48RjIyZdQRRRsQoO5YMGts7Dte7QCdGHgS kpchrbDGUxSNwQKtK/z2s9o= =3qu7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart77835921.2Weo3IfLAM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612181909.35355.max>