From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 22 07:10:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B1516A41F for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:10:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: from web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E132943D46 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:10:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 70810 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Mar 2006 07:10:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=eQDdyUR2aW7czXTq8YhUe9xX5Z6hsEMlp7T+HD3CvZHLr5edFsVqJLzbsrdLsEILqdMfNDE90xsLjrZOmpIYdQstvMpNc3oLGo+wZPT9j5bFZGsw/FkJTUMTEAAMw4Ti4OzQ1JGSD/7pJ/VW0t/omNd72vREdV/zCMVMpG3x9dg= ; Message-ID: <20060322071023.70808.qmail@web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.54.73.238] by web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:10:23 PST Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:10:23 -0800 (PST) From: Arne Woerner To: "Jin Guojun \[VFFS\]" , Gary Thorpe In-Reply-To: <4420D25F.6050203@lbl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, oxy@field.hu Subject: Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabit X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:10:24 -0000 --- "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" wrote: In you example: > Now your 1.6 GB/s reduced to 16MB/s or even worse just based > on this factor. > What did we show by this <
> test? I thought that would prove the memory bandwidth is about 8Gbit/sec (1GByte/sec; 2 * /2^30). But I can see what u mean: On my Athlon XP 2400+ (this should be faster than 2100+) I just get about 5Gbit/sec with the same test (I use DDR RAM and this 266(133*2?)FSB, I think...)... I dont know so much about hardware... But it sounds plaubsible that the architecture around the CPU influences performence... But it is very interesting for me to learn where the bottleneck is... -Arne P.S.: Arne liked "school TV" until it was shutdown... *sob* __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com