From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 22 09:26:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A66F16A427 for ; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tdb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from carrick.bishnet.net (carrick.bishnet.net [84.234.16.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F1243D45 for ; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:26:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tdb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from myrtle.ukc.ac.uk ([129.12.3.176]) by carrick.bishnet.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fi6gT-0004qj-NE; Mon, 22 May 2006 10:26:41 +0100 From: Tim Bishop To: Spadge In-Reply-To: <44709D73.5010709@fromley.net> References: <44709D73.5010709@fromley.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 10:26:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1148289990.11449.3.camel@myrtle.ukc.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bishnet-MailScanner-Information: Contact postmaster@bishnet.net X-Bishnet-MailScanner-VirusCheck: Found to be clean X-Bishnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.399, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Bishnet-MailScanner-From: tdb@freebsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net/pppoa - marked as broken in 7.0, what about 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 09:26:51 -0000 On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 18:03 +0100, Spadge wrote: > I see that on http://www.freshports.org/net/pppoa/ this port is marked > as broken in 7.0, and as it is panicking my kernel in 6.1 I was > wondering if it should also be marked as borken in there, too. > > modem_run loads the firmware fine, as far as I can make out, but pppoa3 > causes a kernel panic on the first run. Could this be something to do > with the difference between older fbsds having user-ppp and newer ones > not? Or is it the other way round? I'd never paid much attention to PPP > before this week, and only vaguely remember seeing mergemaster removing > it when I upgraded to 6.1-release. I'm using it on 6.1 without any problems. Use pppoa2 like this: set device !"/usr/local/sbin/pppoa2 -e -1 -vpi 0 -vci 38 -v 1" The "-e -1" seems to work around the problem. Tim.