From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 23 22:49:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bryden.apana.org.au (bryden.apana.org.au [203.3.126.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0861D37B42C for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:49:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Received: from oracle (CPE-61-9-142-144.vic.bigpond.net.au [61.9.142.144]) by bryden.apana.org.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA22563; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:47:07 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Message-ID: <076f01c0cc82$2f9b8530$0400a8c0@oracle> From: "Doug Young" To: "Linh Pham" Cc: "Ted Mittelstaedt" , "Mark Ibell" , References: Subject: Re: PPP server problem Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:47:23 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Like Intel and their Pentium 4, Rambus and their cruddy Rambus memory, Packard Bell and what used to be their junky computers... the list goes on :) One of my gateway boxes is a P100 Packard Bell that I found in someones trash .... strangely enough its been performing brilliantly & only problem is the occasional sio error :) Obviously they made at least one system that lasted a few years ...... no doubt its the exception that proves the rule though. > > I'm much happier with Windows 2000 over Windows NT 4.0, but no where nearly as happy unless if I have a BSD box that I can SSH into and hack away :) I admin a few W2K systems .... I'm quite impressed with them after NT4 ... they typically run for weeks at a time instead of a matter of hours that seems to be the norm for NT To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message