From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 08:28:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92F116A4A0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:28:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from mail-in05.adhost.com (mail-da01.adhost.com [216.211.128.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93B743CAA for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from ad-exh01.adhost.lan (unknown [216.211.143.69]) by mail-in05.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AA1164887; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:27:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:27:22 -0800 Message-ID: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D5203160167353D@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> In-Reply-To: <20061211171506.97949c7e.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: shmmax tops out at 2G? Thread-Index: AccddXjzPelOrnywTf2YER/CRIiZhgBGrFkg From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" To: "Bill Moran" , Cc: Subject: RE: shmmax tops out at 2G? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:28:10 -0000 Hello Bill: -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Bill Moran Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:15 PM To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: shmmax tops out at 2G? uname -a FreeBSD db00.lab00 6.2-BETA3 FreeBSD 6.2-BETA3 #1: Fri Dec 8 09:27:37 EST 2006 root@db00.lab00:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DB-2850-amd64 amd64 sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax=3D2200000000 kern.ipc.shmmax: 2100000000 -> -2094967296 Looks like an unsigned 32-bit int. That doesn't seem to scale as well as would be expected on 64-bit arch. Is this a mistake, or intentional? I'm working with some big memory systems, and I sure would like to allocate more than 2G for PostgreSQL to use ... --=20 Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. --- This may be a silly question but, have you compiled a PAE-enabled kernel? If not, check out /sys/i386/conf/PAE. Regards, Mike