From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 26 10:23:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31F716A4CF
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:23:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1D543D2F
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:23:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i1QIN8kj080073;
	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:23:08 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:22:31 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20040226.112231.68042660.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: des@des.no
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <xzpk729lnq7.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References: <xzpk729lnq7.fsf@dwp.des.no>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: per-device sysctls
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:23:12 -0000

In message: <xzpk729lnq7.fsf@dwp.des.no>
            des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes:
: @@ -381,6 +388,8 @@
:  	struct dev_event_info *n1 =3D NULL;
:  	struct proc *p;
:  =

: +	if (*data !=3D '?')
: +		printf("devctl: %s", data);

This is bogus.

Also, there's no provision for devices that are in the tree, but have
no drivers attached.  These devices also can consume resources and are
interested from that point of view.

Warner