From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 16 10:27:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F204B16A4CE for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:27:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B726F43D41 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:27:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (c-24-130-110-32.we.client2.attbi.com[24.130.110.32]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <200503161027420150041130e>; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:27:42 +0000 Message-ID: <42380A1D.1010005@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:27:41 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050316) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Time to stop buildling named (and friends) by default in 6-current? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:27:43 -0000 Folks, Way back at the bsdcon in Foster City when we first started talking about importing BIND 9 into the base we also talked about adding more knobs to give users finer grained control over which bits of BIND were built, and turning off the build of named (and associated binaries) by default. Well, the first bit is done, so we're now in the position of being able to flip the NO_BIND_NAMED knob (see make.conf(5) for details) to WITH_BIND_NAMED, and turn it off by default. Is this something that we're still interested in doing? If so, this would be a good time to do it, since I'll be importing 9.3.1 sometime in the next couple days (first round of make world testing is underway), and we're still early in the life of 6-current. Of course, this would only be for 6-current, we wouldn't change the behavior in RELENG_[45]. What do you think? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection