Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:16:02 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why no Oracle on FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <20090925181602.GE28805@guilt.Savvis> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.62.0909251021170.2696@users.757.org> References: <200909241735.n8OHZMVM099476@fire.js.berklix.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0909251754001.40555@freebsd> <4ABCBF61.20205@ibctech.ca> <Pine.NEB.4.62.0909251021170.2696@users.757.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:28:20AM -0400, telmnstr@757.org wrote: > > I'd be willing to bet there is little to no commercial demand for Oracle > on FreeBSD. I wonder how much difference Oracle availability on FreeBSD would make, here. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkq9COIACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKX/WgCfQvJclfcSW8iyxeporlLx1QsM 2MkAn1Pzk7kLVzpzqqBelcIyWkXvIPFR =aq3D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090925181602.GE28805>