Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 22:37:04 +0100 From: Volker <Volker@VWSoft.com> To: Thomas Wintergerst <Thomas.Wintergerst@nord-com.net> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: avm b1 fax? Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20030304222841.04ed2e98@internal.net> In-Reply-To: <3E65149A.1040908@nord-com.net> References: <20020124185941.2399DF9A2@bert.kts.org> <20020124185941.2399DF9A2@bert.kts.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20030303231226.051bee18@internal.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Thomas! At 04.03.2003 22:03, Thomas Wintergerst wrote: >Why do You mean, "having hylafax working under i4b" would not be a good >solution? huups.... I'm really sorry for writing things not very well. No, I didn't say (and really didn't wanted to say) hylafax is a bad solution. It's simple to install and administer but that's it. Many people doesn't like it because of it's bad queue management. I never used hylafax in a production environment recently but as I've been told when using it in a company with some employees, everybody is able to view _any_ received fax which is in the incoming queue. One of my friends was asking me to write a better faxing solution (well... one day I might even do that but it's not an actually planned project). And yes of course you're right: Having hylafax (or even any faxing solution working with i4b) would be great with FreeBSD and i4b. I'll keep you posted. Later, Volker To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.2.20030304222841.04ed2e98>