From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 19:44:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC470207 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from www.mimar.rs (www.mimar.rs [193.53.106.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C592FF1 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tazar.mimar.rs (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE06B9037; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:35:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mimar.rs; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject :subject:from:from:date:date:received:received; s=mimar-0901; t= 1380569699; x=1382384100; bh=x020/odjy03na3oPGCsTcwg0MFWGwBjlIKy 008+f7Fg=; b=iAcT0kd9un8xjBM6s5VkwuPkPnksJGCPibKXKbZ6YiiUISdJ6FR 6ZTfckeV+UiVRETZUV0UcDSRx9kb8qtcNQS2a/UicsCu8dMGs4gxuXbR0Z9MDIiY DYzEXA7SAUtLM4FGK3vd3gOp/3GApeWeGDttyfX2vQtkva1Ur5poiZS8= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs Received: from www.mimar.rs ([127.0.0.1]) by tazar.mimar.rs (tazar.mimar.rs [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id E0JtQZm4zseQ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:34:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kaa.mimar.rs (178-221-85-142.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs [178.221.85.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by www.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1A0EB9035; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:34:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:34:58 +0200 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: Brett Glass Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE stability? Message-Id: <20130930213458.9e73d96a49ff61388bcdc8aa@mimar.rs> In-Reply-To: <201309301901.NAA28515@mail.lariat.net> References: <201309301901.NAA28515@mail.lariat.net> Organization: Mimar X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:44:04 -0000 On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:01:26 -0600 Brett Glass wrote: > How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The=20 > improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling=20 > messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing=20 > lists. It's never clear until the release drops whether these are=20 > actual problems with the software or hardware defects in individual=20 > systems, so I am eager to hear how the new release is working for every= one. I have just upgraded two virtual machines running on ESXi. They are i386 with 256Mb of RAM and one CPU, with just a few ports installed (sudo and screen and dependencies). They don't do much job (low-traffic authoritati= ve nameservers for a dozen of domains). I upgraded by freebsd-update. I don'= t see any problems so far. Also my laptop is 9-STABLE amd64 (currently at r255867) and I do not have any more problems than usual (the unfortunate AR9285 wifi adapter). --=20 Marko Cupa=C4=87