From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Dec 11 7: 8:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (fac13.ds.psu.edu [146.186.61.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EE837B416 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 07:08:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (localhost.ds.psu.edu [127.0.0.1]) by fac13.ds.psu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fBBF86A01356; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:08:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Message-Id: <200112111508.fBBF86A01356@fac13.ds.psu.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Kevin Oberman" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: multiple versions of ports somehow installed. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:59:24 PST." <200112102359.fBANxOd04500@ptavv.es.net> From: dochawk@psu.edu Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:08:06 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG a bit more that I've found. fac13ttyp1:hawk>ls -l /usr/ports/INDEX -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1875832 Nov 19 09:48 /usr/ports/INDEX This hasn't been touched since Nov 19, despite repeated attempts at portsdb -Uu Also, according to the manpage, INDEX.db and INDEX.rbo should be here. They're not. Shouldn't the missing files and inability to do anything cause an error? hawk -- What part of "non-negotiable" didn't you understand? /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings. Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message