From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 29 7:29:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F071837B422; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 07:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hamlet.nectar.com (hamlet.nectar.com [10.0.1.102]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2C81925D; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:29:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by hamlet.nectar.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA84413; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:29:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nectar@spawn.nectar.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:29:40 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Cc: Brandon Fosdick , Neil Blakey-Milner , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Ports layout reorganization (Re: ports tree idea: Combine DESCR and COMMENT) Message-ID: <20000929092940.C72933@hamlet.nectar.com> References: <39CD200B.A10214EA@glue.umd.edu> <20000923233215.A45139@mithrandr.moria.org> <39CD295E.453FF278@glue.umd.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from asami@freebsd.org on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 02:03:37AM -0700 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 02:03:37AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > One issue I'm still wondering is the name of the "checksum" file. We > can put things like size information in there too, so "checksum" is > can still be a misnomer. But the other two names I could think of, > "filelist" will cause a tab-conflict with the "files" directory and > "distfiles" looks too much like the directory in ${PORTSDIR}. distinfo? `distribution information' -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message