From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 23 18:19:06 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4651F16A421;
	Wed, 23 May 2007 18:19:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306F013C455;
	Wed, 23 May 2007 18:19:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012F11A4D83;
	Wed, 23 May 2007 11:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 3513C52EE3; Wed, 23 May 2007 14:19:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:19:04 -0400
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Message-ID: <20070523181903.GA60674@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20070410003837.GB8189@nowhere>
	<20070410011125.GB38535@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20070410013034.GC8189@nowhere> <20070410014233.GD8189@nowhere>
	<4651BD6F.5050301@unsane.co.uk>
	<20070522083112.GA5136@hub.freebsd.org>
	<4652B15D.5060505@unsane.co.uk>
	<20070523085532.GA27542@hub.freebsd.org>
	<20070523093231.GA29797@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<f31419$bd8$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f31419$bd8$1@sea.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:19:06 -0000

On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 12:11:52PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 
> >i.e. plain ZFS wants to use 3/4 of the *physical* RAM in the system
> >(or all but 1GB).  i.e. if you have 16GB in your system then zfs will
> >try to use up to 15GB of it for caching leaving only 1GB for
> >everything else (kernel + userland).
> >
> >I would actually be interested to know how Solaris gets away with
> >this.  It sounds like there must be less of a distinction between
> >memory allocated to the kernel and to userland, and the ability for
> >memory to flow between these two with some form of backpressure when
> >userland wants memory that is currently gobbled by up solaris ZFS.
> 
> Isn't it adequately explained with Sparc being a 64-bit platform?

Not entirely, because solaris also runs on i386 (this is what was
confusing me).  I guess the answer is that ZFS has similar issues on
Solaris i386 that it did on FreeBSD i386.

Kris