From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jan 22 10:48:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.hiwaay.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFCB37B400; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:48:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from bsd.havk.org (user-24-214-88-13.knology.net [24.214.88.13]) by mail.hiwaay.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g0MIm8BZ000743; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:48:08 -0600 (CST) Received: by bsd.havk.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A82081A786; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:48:06 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:48:06 -0600 From: Steve Price To: Yoichi NAKAYAMA , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: question about bento builds for tramp Message-ID: <20020122124806.I62676@bsd.havk.org> References: <20020122132335.B18609@squall.waterspout.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020122132335.B18609@squall.waterspout.com>; from will@csociety.org on Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:23:35PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.5-PRERELEASE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:23:35PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > > (cvs update finished at: Mon Jan 21 13:06:35 PST 2002) > > > > sufficiently later than I've updated tramp as Hardly. Convert PST to GMT and there's only 13 minutes difference between these times. Take into account when the update finished doesn't mean that that's when it got to net/tramp in the 'cvs up' which actually occurred more like 10 minutes after your commit. > > >> cvs log for ports/net/tramp/Makefile > > > date: 2002/01/14 20:53:57; author: yoichi; state: Exp; lines: +24 -3 > > > Update for new distfile (20011228). > > > > but bento builds tramp-emacs{20|21}-0.0.20011123 and causes > > checksum mismatch. Why bento builds with old port? > > Problems like these should be directed at portmgr@. I believe > it's possible that the script was invoked with -noportscvs, and > possibly that still propagates the above information. You'll > have to ask Steve what happened here. It is hard to split hairs over 10 minutes in the whole process. It will use the updated version for the next build. If anyone wants to track down the reason for the few minute discrepency then feel free because I have lots of other things to spend my time on but I'd be happy to use/commit any fixes. :) -steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message