Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:22:25 -0300 (ADT) From: Andrew Hamilton-Wright <AHamiltonWright@MtA.ca> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@telenix.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: going from cvs to svnq Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904010816460.32642@qemg.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904010641100.32642@qemg.org> References: <49D27B25.80003@telenix.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903311728390.60971@qemg.org> <49D2CEF9.9030304@telenix.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904010641100.32642@qemg.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry to follow-up my own note, but . . . On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Andrew Wright wrote: [ further snippage of previous note ] > Strong Caveats: > o ***Early Adopter Warning***: There has not been (as far as I know) a > general call for people to move to this type of repository access except > for committers -- therefore expect rough edges until a general > announcement > is made. I would further urge you to read: http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/projects/GUIDELINES.txt?view=markup for an overview of the information used by the committers, and will further add: Even Stronger Caveat: o The "head" revision translates to something like "current" looking around in http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/ will show you that there are directories other than "head" from which branching is done. Some perusal of the svn manual and poking around in the repository may help you track "current", but there isn't anything in place yet to let you track "stable", for instance. A.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0904010816460.32642>