From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 29 17:07:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F4F62D; Wed, 29 May 2013 17:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (ns1.scsiguy.com [70.89.174.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE2BA23; Wed, 29 May 2013 17:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.6.146] (207-225-98-3.dia.static.qwest.net [207.225.98.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4TH7INa052503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 29 May 2013 17:07:20 GMT (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing From: "Justin T. Gibbs" In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 11:07:13 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <519131D8.9010307@citrix.com> <647F6650-AEED-4784-8A45-98324860EE0A@dckd.nl> <519E1A0C.3070609@citrix.com> To: Outback Dingo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (aslan.scsiguy.com [70.89.174.89]); Wed, 29 May 2013 17:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "xen-users@lists.xen.org" , xen-devel , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 17:07:48 -0000 On May 28, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Outback Dingo = wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Craig Rodrigues = wrote: >=20 >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Outback Dingo = wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> I wrote a blog post specifically for installing 10-CURRENT from a >>>> snapshot ISO and getting bootstrapped >>>> from there, to help the Google Summer of Code Student that I am >>>> mentoring. >>>> What specifically do you want to be backported to 9-STABLE? >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Yes Ive seen the post, however we have a hard requirement for = 9-STABLE >>> for some development work we are >>> currently involved in. And I would prefer not to move our current >>> infrastructure for development to CURRENT. >>> A major portion of our development environment is based on XEN for >>> testing and development. >>> Therefor we realize PVHM is a work in progress, and we have built = some >>> VMs from it, they run exceptionally >>> well, However our build environments refuse to build 9-STABLE on = CURRENT >>> PVHVM, or 10-CURRENT. >>> Lastly Im sure theres a ton of users who would like to see this in = 9.x or >>> 9-STABLE >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >> OK, I misunderstood you since you responded in the thread and quoted = some >> of my post. >> My blog post has nothing relevant to Xen and PVHM, and is specific to >> setting up >> a Google Summer of Code student on a 10-CURRENT environment. The = FreeBSD >> Xen >> and PVHM developers will need to provide the details about their = plans to >> merge their changes to the 9-STABLE branch..... >> that's something which I am not familiar with. >>=20 >=20 > If we can get a diff of the work done against the master Id be happy = to > help backporting and testing I plan to backport the work once we have it all in -current. -- Justin=