Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:34:09 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Nicolas Souchu <nsouch@free.fr> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: some PRs Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407161629100.32282-100000@pancho> In-Reply-To: <20040716220848.A35405@armor.freesurf.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Nicolas Souchu wrote: > Depending on the patch size, some work may or may not take place > on Perforce first. > > Opinions? My only concern is that we may be getting close enough to the code freeze for 5-STABLE, which has so many other areas that need stabilization first, that we might want to consider holding off until 6-CURRENT is branched. I'm guessing, from reading some of the bullet-item summaries, that our ability to ensure stabilization is going to be sufficiently challenged as it is :-) This should probably be a re@ call. I do not remember, myself, when the freeze is scheduled for. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0407161629100.32282-100000>