From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 6 11:47: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB09E37BD2E for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 11:46:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za) by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12S3SZ-0003Kk-00; Mon, 06 Mar 2000 21:46:31 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Clifton Royston Cc: Jaime Bozza , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Perl Base Modules In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Mar 2000 09:15:39 -1000." <20000306091538.B1871@lava.net> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 21:46:31 +0200 Message-ID: <12817.952371991@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 06 Mar 2000 09:15:39 -1000, Clifton Royston wrote: > Give it another chance? Actually, I'm more concerned with how we precisely denote on the vendor branch the origin of the updates. How well the CPAN auto-updater thing works is something of a side-issue at this point. Remember, the CPAN updates are going to get blown out of the water by your next ``make world'' without some Makefile fiddling. basically, if we're going to do this in the source tree without taking the files off the vendor branch, we need a meaningful vendor release tag. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message