From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Sep 14 05:24:10 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id FAA08675
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 05:24:10 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA08668
          for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 05:24:08 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id FAA27936; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 05:23:13 -0700
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 05:23:13 -0700
Message-Id: <199509141223.FAA27936@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: wsantee@wsantee.oz.net
CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199509120303.UAA06846@wsantee.oz.net> (message from Wes Santee on Mon, 11 Sep 1995 20:03:00 -0700 (PDT))
Subject: Re: jpeg-5b port broken in -stable?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Has somebody installed the jpeg-5b port /usr/ports/graphics/jpeg
 * recently?  
 * 
 * If the PLIST package file is any indication, several files aren't
 * being installed.  A quick peek at work/jpeg-5b/Makefile shows us that
 * the JPEG libraries aren't installed by default so only the jpeg
 * executable files are actually installed by the port.  Further, there
 * is no option in either Makefile to build a shared library so anything
 * looking for libjpeg.so.5.3 is SOL.
 * 
 * Is this the expected behavior or is the port broken?  Is there another
 * port that provides libjpeg.so?  Netscape is complaining and I don't
 * know if its complaint is valid or not.

I have no idea why you have a problem like that.  I just tried
/usr/ports/graphics/jpeg on my system (running -stable at the moment),
everything went as expected and libjpeg.so.5.1 was installed.

Satoshi