From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 19:40:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D5AE00 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:40:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34AE1C7 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1IJe18b061935 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1IJe1K7061934; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:40:01 GMT Message-Id: <201302181940.r1IJe1K7061934@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Jaap Akkerhuis Subject: Re: ports/176156: Add multi-instance support to dns/nsd rc script X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jaap Akkerhuis List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:40:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/176156; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jaap Akkerhuis To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, Edwin Groothuis Cc: Subject: Re: ports/176156: Add multi-instance support to dns/nsd rc script Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:31:59 +0100 Edwin, Maintainer of dns/nsd, Please note that PR ports/176156 has just been submitted. If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch and a committer will take care of it. The full text of the PR can be found at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/176156 I'm luke warm about this enhancement. It create more complexity and is probaby only needed by just a small minority of the users. But yes, go ahead, apply the patch. jaap