From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 04:41:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B649F16A4CE for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:41:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F49943D3F for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:41:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru) Received: from sem.ciam.ru ([192.168.45.10] helo=ciam.ru) by mail.ciam.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.x) id 1B6qeY-000HGf-KR; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:41:38 +0300 Message-ID: <40642549.6050202@ciam.ru> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:42:49 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robin Schoonover References: <4062FF7A.2040509@ciam.ru> <20040326011325.4AA3B43D5D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040326011325.4AA3B43D5D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: naddy@mips.inka.de cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sign your name in pkg-descr is useless or useful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:41:42 -0000 Robin Schoonover wrote: > For backwards compatiblity we might want to have `make maintainer` > continue to give just the email, and have `make full-maintainer` give the > name + email. > And desctribe target should be fixed too for backward compatible. But it's quite easy. I'm not sure for bento scripts and may be something more? Anyway a patch can be ready for a few minutes. But what portmgr thinks? -- Sem.